Pages

Saturday, 7 January 2012

Climate change castaways consider move to Australia

Ben Doherty in Male, Maldives
January 7, 2012

Threat ... much of the Maldives could be lost to climate change. Threat ... much of the Maldives could be lost to climate change.
THE President of what could be the first country in the world lost to climate change has urged Australia to prepare for a mass wave of climate refugees seeking a new place to live.
The Maldivian President, Mohamed Nasheed, said his government was considering Australia as a possible new home if the tiny archipelago disappears beneath rising seas.
''It is increasingly becoming difficult to sustain the islands, in the natural manner that these islands have been,'' he told the Herald in an interview in Male, the Maldives capital.
''So … if everyone else around Australia is so poor and unable to fend for themselves and have a decent life, would that necessarily make life in Australia any better? Would that be the castle that you can defend?''
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts a sea-level rise of up to 59 centimetres over the next century, a level that would inundate most of the Maldives' inhabited atolls. Low-lying Pacific island nations, such as Kirabati and Tuvalu, would also face being flooded.
''If nations won't do good for themselves, they really must do good for everyone around, simply in your self-interest as well,'' Mr Nasheed said.
''Not necessarily because you're so nice, and so benevolent and good that you want to provide others with things.
''But I think it's really quite necessary for Australians and for every rich country to understand that this is unlike any other thing that's happened before.''
The country has established a sovereign wealth fund, drawn from its tourist revenue, to be used to buy land overseas and finance the relocation of the country's population of 350,000.
Australia, for its climate and abundance of space, along with Sri Lanka and India, for their proximity and cultural similarities, are the three countries the President has identified as possible destinations.
''They are the talked about countries, though we haven't necessarily had official conversations with these governments,'' Mr Nasheed said.
Eighty per cent of the Maldivian land mass - a string of more than 1200 islands, 200 inhabited, running 750 kilometres north-south in the Indian Ocean - is less than a metre above sea level. The highest point in the entire country is 2.4 metres above sea level, and already, 14 islands have had to be abandoned because of massive erosion by the sea.
Mr Nasheed said Maldivians want to stay but moving was an eventuality his government had to plan for. He said he did not want his people ''living in tents'' for years, or decades, as refugees.
The Maldives is not the first nation to look to Australia as a destination for its climate change refugees. A decade ago, the government of Tuvalu, north of New Zealand in the Pacific Ocean, requested immigration assistance for its population of 12,000 to move to Australia. The Australian government said its humanitarian obligations were to people who require ''assistance urgently''.
Mr Nasheed praised Australia's decision to adopt a carbon tax, describing it as a ''brave move forward''.
''That is the kind of progressive legislation we want to see from other countries,'' he said.
But other Maldivian government officials told the Herald Australia was ''destructive'' at the just-completed round of climate change talks in Durban.
Under the last-minute agreement reached in Durban, countries have agreed to begin work on a new global treaty to cut carbon emissions, to be signed in 2015, but not to come into force until 2020.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/climate-change-castaways-consider-move-to-australia-20120106-1pobf.html#ixzz1ilTcXHvD

Maldives faces tides of change

Ben Doherty, Maldives
January 7, 2012

Mohamed Nasheed: 'If the West stopped their emissions and China, South Africa and  Brazil carried on emitting ... we would still die. The Maldives would disappear.' Mohamed Nasheed: 'If the West stopped their emissions and China, South Africa and Brazil carried on emitting ... we would still die. The Maldives would disappear.'
MOHAMED Nasheed carries the air of a man without much time. ''How did it go? Did we win?'' he asks an aide as he sweeps, almost at a run, down the marbled corridors of the presidential office. Told yes, the vote on the reappointment of his Minister of Islamic Affairs succeeded in his country's fractious parliament, he is pleased: ''That's good, our minister keeps his job. Now, what's next?''
The West Wing Bartlet-esque manner is no mere affection. Mohamed Nasheed is a man running out of time. As President of the Maldives, the string of paradisiacal Indian Ocean islands that could become the first nation ever lost to climate change, there are not too many minutes to waste for Nasheed.
''We've already lost it in so many senses,'' he tells The Saturday Age during a rare moment of peace in a meeting room. His country is losing three inhabited islands a year, swallowed by the ocean, he says. ''People are saying, 'we can't live there any more'. For us, it is difficult not to be worried about the climate.''
Government supporters rally against religious extremism in Male, Maldives. Government supporters rally against religious extremism in Male, Maldives. Photo: AP
Mohamed Nasheed is compact: 155 centimetres and leanly built, with square shoulders and a narrow waist. Maldivian humidity means jackets are usually eschewed, but the 44-year-old favours formality with silver cufflinks and ties with broad knots.
As he speaks, the clipped tones of his British public school education fight for space through the lyrical lilt of Maldivian English. As a man who lives with the consequences of climate change, and looks out his window at a rising sea every day, Nasheed brooks no argument from sceptics.
Even Male - the Maldivian capital and the most densely populated island in the world, with more than 110,000 people crammed onto 1.77 square kilometres - has needed tens of millions of dollars spent on a three-metre seawall to keep the ocean from it. ''The science here is very sorted. They say there is a window of opportunity of about seven or eight years.''
Mohamed Nasheed: 'For us, it is difficult not to be worried about the climate.' Mohamed Nasheed: 'For us, it is difficult not to be worried about the climate.' Photo: AFP
For some in this archipelago, that window is already closed. Fourteen of the country's 200 inhabited islands are already gone, massive coastal erosion making their seaside villages unliveable. A further 70 islands rely on desalinated drinking water because groundwater aquifers have been overcome by seawater.
About 80 per cent of the Maldivian landmass is less than a metre above sea level. The highest point in the entire archipelago is just 2.4 metres. A sea-level rise of 59 centimetres over the next century, the upper limit forecast by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, would make most of the Maldives uninhabitable.
The government is already saving money, squirrelled away from its $600 million tourism industry, to buy land in another country if theirs is lost to the ocean. Sri Lanka and India, for their proximity, and Australia, for its space, are the names that have been publicly considered.
But it's a last resort.
Maldivians whose families have spent countless generations living on 'their' island, can't bear the thought of moving to the next atoll, Nasheed says. They can't fathom abandoning the whole country.
''I said to one lady, 'Ma'am you have to move, we have to take you to another island. And at the end of this whole thing we might have to go elsewhere, all of us.' She told me, 'You can take the island people away but you can't take the sounds away, you can't take the butterflies, you can't take the colours'.
''You can migrate a people,'' Nasheed says, ''but you cannot take a culture, you cannot take a nation, you cannot take a history.''
If the Maldives moves, the Maldives is lost.
For a man whose country needs the world's co-operation to survive, Nasheed can be undiplomatic. French newspaper Le Monde recently quoted him as saying of the UN's Framework Convention on Climate Change: ''The current negotiation process is stupid, useless and endless.''
To The Saturday Age, he doesn't precisely own up to the incendiary language, but nor does he shy from its sentiment. ''I think this UN FCCC is silly … It's built in a form where if two countries agree and a third country comes around and says 'I don't', and then you dilute your positions to accommodate the third country. And countries take so long even to say 'I don't' … at the end of the day the process might actually come out with an agreement that means nothing.''
He wants the framework convention process - bureaucratic, leaden, and immobile without consensus - abandoned, but suggests only in replacement ''a more imaginative way of dealing with it''.
Nasheed believes developed countries, although the largest emitters, are not the only ones that must bear the burden of emissions cuts. The right of developing countries to lift their citizens' standard of living does not absolve them from their obligation to the planet.
''If the West stopped their emissions and China, South Africa and Brazil carried on emitting on the basis of business as usual, we would still die. The Maldives would disappear,'' he said during a recent European visit.
Nasheed appreciates the complexities of trying to engineer a global climate deal that has so far eluded 17 major climate change congresses over as many years. He understands his bargaining position, and the domestic pressures guiding the hands of other nations.
He realises, too, his is a nation without economic, military or diplomatic clout. Nasheed is not above a media stunt to draw attention to the plight of his country, or to the Alliance of Small Island States, of which he is totemic leader.
In 2009 Nasheed and his ministers dressed in scuba gear for the world's first ever underwater cabinet meeting. The same year he allowed a documentary crew to follow him through his negotiations at the Copenhagen climate talks. The film that emerged, The Island President, has won acclaim at film festivals around the globe.
The week The Saturday Age was in Male, Nasheed invited the country's media to watch him install a solar panel on the roof of the president's office building, part of his pledge to make the Maldives carbon neutral by 2020.
Nasheed leans forward in conversation, and speaks quickly, a man perpetually short of hours in his day. But there was a period, his recent history, when Nasheed had nothing but time.
Returning to the Maldives from Britain in the late '80s, Nasheed became an outspoken critic of the despotic, one-party rule of his predecessor, Maumoon Abdul Gayoom. Nasheed was jailed in 1991, the first of more than a dozen times he would be arrested and imprisoned. He was tortured by the Gayoom regime, and spent 18 months in solitary confinement in a metal shack barely 90 by 150 centimetres.
Released, he was elected to parliament in 2000, but jailed again on trumped-up charges of stealing ''unidentified government property''. His daughter Zaya was born during his second stint of solitary confinement.
Nasheed was banished to the tiny island of Angolhitheem, population 30, for six months, before being placed under house arrest. On his final release in 2003 he fled the Maldives for Sri Lanka, where he established the Maldivian Democratic Party in exile.
But he returned to his homeland, to a hero's welcome, in 2005 and in 2008, in the first ever multi-party elections held in the Maldives, beat the sitting president in a run-off vote, securing 54 per cent of the vote.
Remarkably, Nasheed has allowed the man who imprisoned him to stay in the Maldives, free from sanction or punishment.
''I have forgiven my jailers, the torturers. They were following orders … I ask people to follow my example and leave Gayoom to grow old here,'' he said upon taking office.
The elderly Maumoon remains on Male, more actively involved in the vituperative world of Maldives politics than the President's supporters would like.
Once prisoner, now President, Nasheed finds himself leading a country facing significant problems beyond the slowly rising seas. None are unique to a developing Muslim country or an island state, but they are especially acute in his tiny, diffuse homeland.
The Maldives has a massive youth bulge: 44 per cent of the country is under 14, and 62 per cent under 25, but jobs for any, especially beyond working on a tourist resort, are hard to find. In the atolls, a quarter of all young men are unemployed, half of all young women.
The country also has a serious drug problem. An epidemic of cheap heroin has swept through the archipelago, but taken root in Male in particular. The UN has estimated 40 per cent of the country's youth use hard drugs.
Nasheed, a Muslim as the Maldives constitution obliges all Maldivians to be, also faces a rising tide of Islamic fundamentalism. Wahhabist Islamic scholars, most schooled in madrassas in Pakistan, are radicalising Islam in the Maldives. Female circumcision is practised, and is reportedly on the increase, across the archipelago. There are calls for the return of amputation for crimes and for the banning of music and dancing. Women are flogged for having extra-marital sex.
Every effort to resist this gathering radicalisation is painted by Nasheed's political opponents as an attack on Islam. After Islamist protesters threatened on a website to ''slaughter anybody against Islam'', Nasheed was forced into confrontation: ''Kill me before you kill a fellow Maldivian.''
Financially, too, the Maldives' dependence on wealthy Western tourists has left it vulnerable to the vicissitudes of the global economy. The IMF this year withheld loans, declaring the Maldives at moderate risk of debt distress, and forced the country to introduce an income tax and a GST, as well as massively reduce government spending, largely through cutting the country's bloated public service.
Everywhere in the Maldives, the government's new eye for the frugal is apparent. The former Presidential Palace has become the Supreme Court (Nasheed lives in his own house), even the ornate leather thrones that were once in the meeting room where he meets with The Saturday Age have been replaced by bottom-of-the-line blue-cloth office chairs.
But climate change dominates the President's agenda. While the course of global climate action is largely in the hands of others, Mohamed Nasheed says he feels a sense of responsibility to do what he can to save his country.
''Any responsible Maldives government should be mindful of what might happen in the future, and save for that rainy day.''
His government talks of climate contingencies, of floating islands, desalination and of making a new homeland in other countries, but he believes the Maldives' only chance lies with holding back the tide. And time is running out.
''If we start seeing disasters one after the other, I think that would be … when countries would suddenly start acting. Now that might be very late in the day, but perhaps it is already very late … it's getting very, very late.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/maldives-faces-tides-of-change-20120106-1po9r.html#ixzz1ilTUZk4s

Thursday, 5 January 2012

China scathing of Canada's Kyoto withdrawal

Canada's historic decision to withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol has provoked heavy criticism from China, with Beijing saying the move went against international efforts to combat climate change.Canada on Monday became the first country to formally withdraw from the protocol, saying the pact on cutting carbon emissions was preventing the world from effectively tackling climate change.
The move is "against the efforts of the international community and is regrettable," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Liu Weimin told a regular media briefing.
"We hope Canada will face up to its responsibilities and obligations, honour its commitments and actively participate in relevant international cooperation against climate change."
China is the world's biggest emitter of carbon but has always insisted that as a developing country it should be exempt from binding obligations on emissions.
But Australia's Climate Change Minister, Greg Combet, has defended Canada's withdrawal, insisting the country is still committed to reducing pollution.
"The Canadian decision to withdraw from the protocol should not be used to suggest Canada does not intend to play its part in global efforts to tackle climate change," a spokesman said in a statement.
"In Durban, Canada made clear it supports a new international climate change agreement that includes commitments from all major emitters."

The landmark Kyoto pact, reached in 1997, is the only global treaty that sets down targeted curbs in global emissions.
But those curbs apply only to rich countries, excluding the United States - which has refused to ratify the accord.
Beijing believes that developed nations, with their long history of industrialisation, should take responsibility for climate change and has called for more funding to help poorer nations cope with its impact on them.
But the lack of binding constraints over giants like China and India and Washington's refusal to join the protocol have gravely weakened efforts to address climate change, especially after the near-collapse of talks in Copenhagen in 2009.
Canada agreed under the Kyoto Protocol to reduce CO2 emissions to 6 per cent below 1990 levels by 2012, but its emissions of the gases blamed for damaging Earth's fragile climate system have instead increased sharply.
Participants in the UN climate conference in Durban, South Africa, last week reached an accord that for the first time will bring all major greenhouse-gas emitters under a single legal roof.
If approved as scheduled in 2015, the pact will be operational from 2020 and become the prime weapon in the fight against climate change.
Environmentalists have called it porous, but Mr Combet says the new accord is a very significant breakthrough.
"There's a lot of work to do, but it also means that the implementation of the Government's carbon price mechanism is very timely indeed, because by 2020 we'll be part of a legally binding deal to cut emissions, and we need to get ready for that," he said.

Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-12-13/china-hits-out-at-canada27s-kyoto-withdrawal/3729740

2011 - a 'horrible year' for elephants

Friday, December 30, 2011 » 12:30pm

Large seizures of elephant tusks make this year the worst on record since ivory sales were banned in 1989, with recent estimates suggesting as many as 3000 elephants were killed by poachers, experts say.
'2011 has truly been a horrible year for elephants,' said Tom Milliken, elephant and rhino expert for the wildlife trade monitoring network TRAFFIC.
In one case earlier this month, Malaysian authorities seized hundreds of African elephant tusks worth $1.3 million that were being shipped to Cambodia. The ivory was hidden in containers of Kenyan handicrafts.
'In 23 years of compiling ivory seizure data ... this is the worst year ever for large ivory seizures,' said Milliken.
Most cases involve ivory being smuggled from Africa into Asia, where growing wealth has fed the desire for ivory ornaments and for rhino horn that is used in traditional medicine, though scientists have proved it has no medicinal value.
TRAFFIC said Asian crime syndicates are increasingly involved in poaching and the illegal ivory trade across Africa, a trend that coincides with growing Asian investment on the continent.
'The escalation in ivory trade and elephant and rhino killing is being driven by the Asian syndicates that are now firmly enmeshed within African societies,' Milliken said in a telephone interview from his base in Zimbabwe on Thursday.
'There are more Asians than ever before in the history of the continent, and this is one of the repercussions.'
Some of the seized tusks came from old stockpiles, the elephants having been killed years ago.
But the International Fund for Animal Welfare said recent estimates suggest more than 3000 elephants have been killed for their ivory in the past year alone.
'Reports from Central Africa are particularly alarming and suggest that if current levels of poaching are sustained, some countries, such as Chad, could potentially lose their elephant populations in the very near future,' said Jason Bell, director of the elephant program for the fund based in Yarmouth Port, Massachusetts.
He said poaching had also reached 'alarming levels' in Congo, northern Kenya, southern Tanzania and northern Mozambique.
Milliken thinks criminals may have the upper hand in the war to save rare and endangered animals.
'As most large-scale ivory seizures fail to result in any arrests, I fear the criminals are winning,' Milliken said.
In Tanzania's Selous Game Reserve alone, some 50 elephants a month are being killed and their tusks hacked off, according to the Washington-based Environmental Investigation Agency.
With shipments so large, criminals have taken to shipping them by sea instead of by air, falsifying documents with the help of corrupt officials, monitors said.
In another sign of corruption, Milliken said some of the seized ivory has been identified as coming from government-owned stockpiles - made up of both confiscated tusks and those from dead elephants.
Rhinos also have suffered: A record 443 rhino were killed this year in South Africa, according to National Geographic News Watch.
That surpassed last year's figure of 333 dead rhino, despite the government deploying soldiers to protect the endangered animals this year in its flagship Kruger National Park.
National Geographic reported this week that 244 of the rhino killed this year were poached in Kruger, and that figure is expected to rise before the end of the month.
South Africa is home to 90 per cent of the rhinos left on the continent, and Kruger has more than 10,000 white rhinos and about 500 black rhinos.
Africa's elephant population was estimated at between 5 million and 10 million before European hunters came to the continent with colonisation. Massive poaching for the ivory trade in the 1980s halved the remaining number of African elephants to about 600,000.
Following the 1989 ban on ivory trade and concerted international efforts to protect the animals, elephant herds in east and southern Africa were thriving before the new threat arrived from Asia.
A report from Kenya's Amboseli National Park highlighted the dangers. There had been almost no poaching for 30 years in the park, which lies in the shadow of Mount Kilimanjaro, until a Chinese company was awarded the contract to build a highway nearby two years ago.
Amboseli has lost at least four of its 'big tuskers' since then.

Source: http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Environment/2011/12/30/2011_-_a_horrible_year_for_elephants_701990.html

Death of Splits the roo upsets locals

Wednesday, January 04, 2012 » 02:08pm


 
The death of furry friend, Splits the kangaroo, has devastated the southeast Queensland community.
The death of furry friend, Splits the kangaroo, has devastated the southeast Queensland community.

George and Carmel Watson are devastated their mate Splits the kangaroo will no longer be dropping by for afternoon tea.
Announcing her presence with a knock on the back door, Splits would regularly visit the Watsons looking for her favourite treat - a slice of bread.
Splits and more than 20 kangaroos were found dead by a group of horse riders on a property near Booral, in southeast Queensland last month.
No charges have been laid over the killing but a police officer has been questioned.
The Watsons told AAP that Splits was a popular character in the region and had been visiting people for five years.
'She was quite happy around people,' Ms Watson said.
'She used to let us pat the little joey in her pouch,' Mr Watson added.
Mrs Watson said Splits was not the first kangaroo to come knocking.
'There was another one, Maxi, many many years ago,' she said.
'Splits could have been a joey from the original quiet one (Maxi).'
Kangaroos are a protected species and it is an offence to shoot one without a permit, which can be granted if there is damage being done by a kangaroo population.
But Mr Watson said the kangaroos weren't posing any problems to the community.
'There's that much feed here, the roos weren't taking it off the cattle,' he said.
A police officer is one of a number of people questioned over the shooting, which involved the point-blank slaughter of several joeys.
Queensland Police say the police officer concerned told investigators he had 'the long-term permission from an owner of the property to be on the property and use firearms there'.
Three joeys rescued from the scene were taken to wildlife refuges but all have since died.
If found guilty, the culprit could face more than $200,000 in fines for killing a protected species.

Source:  http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Environment/2012/01/04/Death_of_Splits_the_roo_upsets_locals_703625.html

Monday, 2 January 2012

Siberia Melting and releasing Methane Gas

Climate Change – Ten Easy Ways To Make A Difference

We can all make a difference for the better when it comes to our treatment of the environment. Ideally we should stop using fossil fuel. Not only would that prevent emissions but it would cut down our consumption of things quite drastically. The global warming crisis would then end in about thirty years and global temperatures would be at safe levels. That would be good but…
if I urged that we give up fossil fuel (and give up wood burning while we are being environmentally friendly) no one would listen. It is behaviour that runs counter intuitive to our expectations. Today every nation, every politician, every news media pundit is talking about economic growth as a panacea to our economic woes. Stop using fossil fuel and you would reverse economic growth, the mantra goes. Telling people that we should reverse economic growth in order to provide somewhere to live for our descendants is a tale to which no one will listen, whether the tale is true or not.
So if we cannot solve the problem of global warming quickly because we do not want to solve that problem and regard other problems as more pressing, then I must suggest some ways to make a difference which do not affect lifestyles, do not threatened to worry people with fears of economic Armageddon. The easy ways to make a difference will not reverse global warming but would slow it down.
I am not expressing these as New Year’s resolutions; they are more important that that.
1. Drive moderately, avoiding heavy braking and acceleration
2. Lower the thermostat in your home by three or four degrees. You will soon get used to it and feel more comfortable when you do. If you are very old and need to keep warm for medical reasons ignore this advice.
3. Plant a tree a month. Plant a tree that is native to where you live. If you have nowhere to plant a tree, subscribe to a tree planting scheme that plants local trees.
4. Buy a washing line and some wooden pegs. Stop using the tumble dryer. Drying your clothes outside is free and you will soon recover the cost of the washing line and pegs.
5. I know it is a pain, but recycle assiduously.
6. Instead of throwing them in the bin, give your old serviceable stuff to charity shops or Goodwill.
7. Walk around town for short journeys. It is often quicker. If you can, use the cycle schemes that are in many cities.
8. Buy locally produced food wherever you can. As a rule of thumb, the closer it was produced to the shop in which you bought it, the fewer emissions have been created.
9. Buy less stuff. When you do buy stuff buy quality which will last instead of cheap stuff that will soon fall apart.
10. Turn off the lights when you walk out of a room.
Now, these things will not “save the planet” but they do not involve any sacrifice and will make a difference and help juts a little in the fight against climate change..

Source: http://robertkyriakides.wordpress.com/2012/01/02/climate-change-ten-easy-ways-to-make-a-difference/