Pages

Monday 29 August 2011

Sandbag strategy leaves beach's future living on the edge

EMERGENCY work to prevent further coastal erosion at the northern NSW town of Kingscliff has been stalled by red tape, with council staff warning many more seaside communities will face the same problem unless the complex coastal protection laws are streamlined.
Kingscliff has lost an estimated 40 metres of beach to the sea in less than two months, leaving the surf club and cabins at a caravan park dangling at the edge of the water.
But protection works must stop by Friday because NSW legislation requires the council to go through a public tender process to procure more sandbags.
The council-owned Kingscliff Beach Holiday Park has already spent $800,000 on temporary protection works, and is building a four metre-high sandbag wall along the most damaged sections of beach. Phase two, for which they have environmental approval, requires larger, more durable sandbags but the council must cease work for at least a week for the procurement process.
Richard Adams, who runs the park for Tweed Shire, said the situation was ''frustrating''.
''In an emergency event like this, where clearly there is an extenuating circumstance, it would be great if we could go to the government and say let's look at some way to relieve us from some of the more protracted planning consent and procurement issues,'' he said.
The government has agreed to pay for a $75,000 study to investigate sand nourishment at Kingscliff.
The co-ordinator of natural resources management at Tweed Shire, Jane Lofthouse, warned that more towns will face similar problems.
''This is a real wake-up call for all coastal communities, that this is the sort of impacts they're facing [from climate change],'' Ms Lofthouse, who is also a member of the NSW Coastal Panel which advises the environment minister on coastal erosion, said. ''It doesn't even have to be a big storm event, and it's not all about sea level rise.
''All you need is a bit of an elevation in the tidal levels and a bit of a change in the swell direction. That then changes the alignment of beaches, so areas that have previously been stable can become unstable.''
A big storm in 2009 weakened the Kingscliff foreshore, but it was a combination of the La Nina weather pattern, higher-than-predicted tides and easterly swells in July that suddenly chewed up several metres of beach and dune in days. Overnight the land in front of holiday park cabins disappeared, and the council had to urgently shift the buildings 20 metres back by crane. Now there is only a few metres of turf left between them and the sea.
The council's long-term strategy to save Kingscliff is a $6 million plan to pump 300,000 cubic metres of sand through a pipeline from the Tweed River to rebuild the dunes, but sufficient funding has not been secured.
Kingscliff business owners are worried, with the erosion already affecting tourist numbers.
''It's very disappointing that the state government has taken such a hands-off approach,'' said Chris Paine, the owner of Galileo's Pizza Cafe opposite the beach.
''The problem's far greater than council's resources can possibly muster … the state government's committed the impressive sum of $75,000 to conduct a study, due back in 18 months' time. This won't last 18 months - this won't last 18 weeks. What's to become of Kingscliff if there's no beach?''

Power bill rises not so harsh, says survey

PREDICTIONS that the Australian carbon price will rise once emissions trading starts in 2015 have been challenged by an analysis that found the price would slump dramatically because of an influx of cheap international permits.
Research by analysts at Bloomberg New Energy Finance found the carbon price would fall from a fixed $25 in 2014-15 to $16 when emissions trading began in 2015-16. Government modelling released last month suggested the price would rise to $29 in 2015 and to $38 by 2020.
A carbon price of $16 would mean a much more modest increase in power bills, and much less government revenue from the sale of carbon permits.
It would drain the pool of money available to compensate heavy-polluting industries, and to invest in renewable energy.
The analysis suggested emissions trading would add less to consumer prices than the 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product forecast by Treasury.
It found the price under emissions trading would stay at the minimum level allowed under the proposed carbon legislation - known as the floor price - reaching only $17.50 by the end of the decade.
The group's carbon research manager, Seb Henbest, said the design of the legislation meant the price was likely to be driven by the international market.
''As demand from the European Union emissions trading scheme slows we expect the international carbon price to fall below the Australian price floor,'' he said.
Mr Henbest said a lower carbon price would reinforce the need to retain other policies to cut emissions, including the national target of 20 per cent of energy coming from renewable sources by 2020. The analysis assumed there would be a market in international carbon credits in Europe, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea, but not the US and Canada.

The carbon tax will pass - Swan


Treasurer Wayne Swan says the carbon tax will pass parliament and that will show the world Australia has clear policy goals.
Mr Swan said one of Australia's great advantages compared to other countries was that parliament was passing legislation quickly even though there's a minority government.
'It is a great strength for Australia compared to what is going on elsewhere in Europe and the United States, underpinned by our strong fiscal position and our clear and consistent set of fiscal rules,' he told Sky News on Sunday.
He said this was underlined by the fact the May budget - the first under the minority government arrangement - passed more quickly than any of his previous budgets.
And he said the carbon price legislation, due to be introduced in the next sitting period in September, would be no different.
'It will go to the parliament, it will be debated and it will pass,' he said.
'We've had a particularly difficult political debate surrounding all that but the record speaks for itself.'
Mr Swan said passing the carbon tax would show the world Australia has 'got its eye on the main game'.
He said extreme interpretation of economic data by sections of the media were not helping confidence in Australia's economy.
'That does send a difficult message into the lounge rooms and kitchens of Australia where people are sitting there and saying on the one hand we're talking about a resources boom and strong investment pipeline and on the other what they see is a lot of uncertainty and turbulence in the international economy,' he said.
'We don't need some of the more extreme interpretations that we see in the media ... that when a piece of data comes out we get the downside interpretation of that data and we get it multiplied by 10.'


Source: http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Environment/2011/08/28/The_carbon_tax_will_pass_-_Swan_655150.html

Supermarkets look to green future

The Federal Government's carbon tax has prompted Metcash to conduct energy audits to show supermarket owners how to reduce their electricity consumption.

Video Here: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-23/supermarkets-look-to-green-future/2852100

Saturday 27 August 2011

Gallup: Americans less likely to view climate change as threat

Summary: Although a slight majority of U.S. residents still believe global warming is a serious personal concern, fewer are willing to admit that humans are at least partially responsible.
Oh goody, a new Gallup poll for the politicians to play with over the weekend! The research organization is reporting that residents are really no more or less aware about climate change during 2010 than they were several years before, in 2007 and 2008.
In the United States, for example, the number of people say they know a great deal about global warming or climate change is off 1 percent to 96 percent. What is off significantly, however, is both the percentage of Americans who believe that global warming is a serious treat and the number of people who think that it comes from human causes or both human and natural causes.

You’ll see that a majority of Americans do believe that global warming, outside of the cause, is a serious threat: 55 percent of the people surveyed in 2010 held that opinion, although that was off 9 percent from the previous polling period. We seem to be stalemated now as to whether humans have anything to do with global warming. Approximately 50 percent of the Gallup respondents held that view, off 11 percent from 2007-2008.
The Gallup data is drawn from different sets of data in the Top Five greenhouse gas-emitting countries. There were 1,005 interviews in the United States, 1,000 interviews in Japan, 4,151 interviews in China, 6,000 interviews in India and 4,000 interviews in Russia. The interviews took place late in 2010. The margin of error ranges from + o - 1.7 percentage points to + or - 3.9 percentage points.
None of these five countries are expected to adopt or embrace climate policies or come to any kind of deal about climate action before the Kyoto Protocol expires next year in 2012.
The citizens of Japan are more likely than U.S. citizens to be concerned about global warming: 77 percent view it as a serious personal threat and 88 percent believe it is at least partially due to human factors. These people were surveyed before the March tsunami.
The views of Russians were gathered at two different times in 2010: after the record heat wave there last summer, more of them were likely to see global warming as a serious threat (about the same number as Americans).
Far fewer Chinese survey respondents were aware of climate change or global warming, only about 65 percent. The ones who ARE aware of it see humans as being responsible: about 75 percent attribute global warming at least in part to human factors. BUT only 32 percent of the respondents see it as a personal threat.
The Indian survey respondents had the lowest awareness about climate change: Only 37 percent of the adults surveyed knew anything about it. Among those who were aware of the phenomenon, 83 percent believe it is a serious threat and 74 percent believe that global warming results from human causes/both human and natural causes.
Noted Gallup in its analysis:
“Residents in these countries may not necessarily agree about the severity of the risk or who is to blame, but previous Gallup surveys show they agree that developed and emerging nations should reduce emissions at the same time, rather than wait for one group to cut them first.”
We’ll see how this data plays out over the weekend, as the climate deniers will likely have a field day. Oh, wait, my electricity will be probably be out in New Jersey because of another extreme weather event (aka Hurricane Irene), so I will probably miss it.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/green/gallup-americans-less-likely-to-view-climate-change-as-threat/18598

Join Muscovites in their Twitter campaign to save Khimki Forest (@MedvedevRussia)

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has the power and the responsibility to save the legally protected Khimki Forest from destruction and if you want to ask him to act he can be conveniently reached on his Twitter account (@MedvedevRussia).  Send him a message.

Khimki Forest

Charges of corruption

With high-level political backing that’s raised charges of corruption, a French company wants to run a toll road right through Moscow’s centuries old Khimki Forest – despite its legally protected status. Today, Russians across the country are calling for the protection of the forest, and we’re asking people around the world to support them.
A year ago today, President Medvedev ordered a halt to construction of the controversial highway. Despite this order, which was widely reported in the press, construction of the road continued. Activists and journalists demanding to see the forest clearing permit on site were instead beaten by police and private security forces.

Background


Forest clearing has already begun.
In December 2010, a government commission on transport and communications decided the construction through Khimki Forest could continue. Proper public consultation hadn’t happened, and this decision was taken behind closed doors and apparently endorsed by President Medvedev. Expert input on 11 alternative routes for the highway, some of which are shorter and less expensive to construct, were ignored, while a public poll in August 2010 showed 67 percent of Muscovites opposed sacrificing the Khimki Forest for the new road. According to the President’s spokeswoman Natalia Timakova the Moscow authorities who chose the route through Khimki Forest were allegedly influenced by the interests of businessmen who had plans to develop the land the forest is on.

Police watch as forest clearing continues.
The company benefiting from this collusion is Vinci, a French international construction giant that is leading the construction of the toll highway. France and Russia have significant bilateral economic ties – and on the surface the Russian government refuses to consider the alternative routes for the toll highway because of huge penalties it says would then be owed to Vinci for the change in plans. Vinci seems to have pressured the Russian government to begin construction quickly, leading to violence against the activists working to protect the forest. Not only is Vinci complicit in the human rights abuses suffered by the activists and local residents actively resisting the decimation of Khimki, but investigations have revealed offshore tax havens that may be used to conceal some of the shareholders or beneficiaries of the toll highway project. A company like Vinci which does not respect Russian civil society or practice transparency should not be benefiting at the cost of the Russian people and the environment. The determined civil society resistance to the destruction of the legally-protected Khimki Forest has resulted in significant conflict and turned the protection of this rare ecosystem into an international issue. We are appealing to President Medvedev to protect Russian civil society rights and stop the destruction of Khimki Forest.

Source: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/join-muscovites-in-their-twitter-campaign-to-/blog/36496/

Uruguay and Peru Wind Prices Hit New Low


SOUTH AMERICA: Wind-energy prices in South America are following the trend set by Brazil last week and continuing to fall.
Both Uruguay and Peru have recently completed wind-energy auctions with prices hitting $63/MWh and $69/MWh respectively.
However, none of these matched the record low prices set in Brazil, which awarded projects for as little as $61/MWh.
Uruguay’s second tender attracted 23 bids from 17 companies for just under 1.1GW. This was a significant reduction of the first tender where the lowest price was $85/MWh.
The Uruguayan state electricity company Usinas y Transmissiones Electricas (UTE) is currently studying the bids.
The trend for lower prices, compared to other parts of the world, correlates with Brazil. In last week’s auction the average prices were 23.1% less than last year.
Brazilian prices were already the lowest in the world — except in parts of northern China — from an auction system at $75/MWh.

Source: http://www.greenenergyforearth.com/2011/08/26/uruguay-and-peru-wind-prices-hit-new-low/

Temperatures soar in eastern Europe

Friday, August 26, 2011 » 05:53am


 
 
 
The Balkans is suffering a near-record heat wave as temperatures soar across much of Eastern Europe.
The Balkans is suffering a near-record heat wave as temperatures soar across much of Eastern Europe.
Advertisement
Officials in the Balkans are trying to cope with a near-record heat wave as temperatures soar across much of eastern Europe, with wildfires raging and people fainting on the streets.
Authorities in Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Macedonia, Bosnia and Albania issued heat warnings on Thursday for people to stay indoors and drink water to avoid hyperthermia.
Doctors in Belgrade said emergency teams have received over 600 calls since Wednesday from residents feeling sick from the heat.
'People are collapsing and falling on the streets,' said emergency clinic doctor Zeljko Bacevic.
One of the hottest spots was in Montenegro, where temperatures in the past few days reached more than 40 degC, prompting authorities to recommend working hours be cut to skip the midday heat.
In Macedonia, authorities said people older than 60 and pregnant women should not go to work. In Bosnia, workers' unions urged construction companies to pull their employees from open air construction sites.
In the central Bosnian city of Mostar, temperatures soared to 45degC on Wednesday as kids jumped on melting asphalt, leaving their footprints in the streets.
'The only way to deal with this is in the river,' said Mostar high school student Semir Hebib. 'I sleep on my balcony and in the morning I go and sit next to or in the Neretva river till the evening.'
In the south of Bosnia, an increasing number of people are suffering from stomach infections, doctors said.
'High temperatures are ideal for bacterial infections caused by the consumption of spoiled food,' said doctor Dijana Mamic, the head of a hospital in the town of Livno. She said the town had over 50 cases this week.
Montenegro and Albania are fighting several wildfires near their capitals and on the Adriatic Sea coastline, but no major injuries or damage have been reported.
Meteorologists say the current temperatures in the Balkans are some 10 degrees Celsius higher that the average for this time of year. They add that the heat wave which has arrived from northern Africa is expected to last for several more days.

Source: http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Environment/2011/08/26/Temperatures_soar_in_eastern_Europe_654379.html

US east coast to suffer Irene's wrath

Hurricane Irene remains on course to batter the east coast of the United States this weekend, as extraordinary images from space revealed the scale of the powerful storm.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has urged residents to move to higher ground if necessary or even evacuate the city.
And US National Hurricane Centre boss Bill Read has warned that the storm could cause disruption well inland.
Irene has strengthened to a Category Three storm, with winds of 120mph (195km) as it wreaked havoc across the Caribbean and edged towards the US mainland.
The first hurricane of this year's storm season is expected to gather power as it races across the warm waters of the Caribbean in the next 48 hours.
It could be upgraded to a Category Four - classified as having winds of up to 155mph - within 24 hours.
Live television pictures from the International Space Station, orbiting the earth 200 miles up, showed the sheer size of Irene's cyclonic cloud.
Forecasters said it could threaten densely populated centres in the northeast, including New York and Philadelphia, with its predicted path also passing close by major tourist destinations on the coast of the Carolinas.
It is expected to miss Florida and Georgia.
Bill Read, director of the US National Hurricane Centre, said: 'The exact centre of the storm may actually stay pretty close to the coastline during the day on Saturday and then become a big threat for New England and perhaps Long Island on Sunday.
'Be advised, it is going to be a very large circulation as it moves north of the Carolinas.'
Irene would be the first hurricane to make direct landfall in the United States since Hurricane Ike hit Texas in 2008, and authorities have warned people to make emergency preparations.
Some islands off North Carolina's Outer Banks have already been evacuated.
People up and down the coast have been stocking up on food and water with shops also reporting a run on batteries and generators and plywood for boarding up windows.
Even if the centre of the hurricane stays offshore, forecasters said it could still lash cities including Washington and New York with rain and winds strong enough to knock out power, trigger coastal storm surges and cause flooding.
Laura Southard, emergency department spokeswoman for the state of Virginia, said: 'We are not paying attention just to the eye of the storm.
'We are looking at how wide it is, how large it is.'
US President Barack Obama, on holiday in Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts, has been briefed on plans put in place by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
At least one person died when Irene hit the island of Puerto Rico this week.
The storm has caused damage across the Caribbean and major cruise lines have rearranged itineraries for a dozen ships in the region.

Source: http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Environment/2011/08/26/US_east_coast_to_suffer_Irenes_wrath_654381.html

Power bill rises not so harsh, says survey

PREDICTIONS that the Australian carbon price will rise once emissions trading starts in 2015 have been challenged by an analysis that found the price would slump dramatically because of an influx of cheap international permits.
Research by analysts at Bloomberg New Energy Finance found the carbon price would fall from a fixed $25 in 2014-15 to $16 when emissions trading began in 2015-16. Government modelling released last month suggested the price would rise to $29 in 2015 and to $38 by 2020.
A carbon price of $16 would mean a much more modest increase in power bills, and much less government revenue from the sale of carbon permits.
It would drain the pool of money available to compensate heavy-polluting industries, and to invest in renewable energy.
The analysis suggested emissions trading would add less to consumer prices than the 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product forecast by Treasury.
It found the price under emissions trading would stay at the minimum level allowed under the proposed carbon legislation - known as the floor price - reaching only $17.50 by the end of the decade.
The group's carbon research manager, Seb Henbest, said the design of the legislation meant the price was likely to be driven by the international market...

Wednesday 24 August 2011

USA becomes Food Stamp Nation but is it sustainable?

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Genna Saucedo supervises cashiers at a Wal-Mart in Pico Rivera, California, but her wages aren't enough to feed herself and her 12-year-old son.
Saucedo, who earns $9.70 an hour for about 26 hours a week and lives with her mother, is one of the many Americans who survive because of government handouts in what has rapidly become a food stamp nation.
Altogether, there are now almost 46 million people in the United States on food stamps, roughly 15 percent of the population. That's an increase of 74 percent since 2007, just before the financial crisis and a deep recession led to mass job losses.
At the same time, the cost doubled to reach $68 billion in 2010 -- more than a third of the amount the U.S. government received in corporate income tax last year -- which means the program has started to attract the attention of some Republican lawmakers looking for ways to cut the nation's budget deficit.
While there are clearly some cases of abuse by people who claim food stamps but don't really need them, for many Americans like Saucedo there is little current alternative if they are to put food on the table while paying rent and utility bills.
"It's kind of sad that even though I'm working that I need to have government assistance. I have asked them to please put me on full-time so I can have benefits," said the 32-year-old.
She's worked at Wal-Mart for nine months, and applied for food stamps as soon as her probation ended. She said plenty of her colleagues are in the same situation.
So are her customers. Bill Simon, head of Wal-Mart's U.S. operations, told a conference call last Tuesday that the company had seen an increase in the number of shoppers relying on government assistance for food.
About forty percent of food stamp recipients are, like Saucedo, in households in which at least one member of the family earns wages. Many more could be eligible: the government estimates one in three who could be on the program are not.
"If they're working, they often think they can't get help. But people can't support their families on $10, $11, $12 an hour jobs, especially when you add transport, clothes, rent." said Carolyn McLaughlin, executive director of BronxWorks, a social services organization in New York.
The maximum amount a family of four can receive in food stamps is $668 a month. They can only be used to buy food -- though not hot food -- and for plants and seeds to grow food.
Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all made efforts to raise awareness about the program and remove the stigma associated with it.
In 2004, paper coupons were replaced with cards similar to debit cards onto which benefits can be loaded. In 2008 they were renamed Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits though most people still call them food stamps.
Despite the bipartisan support for the program in the past, some of the recent political rhetoric has food stamp advocates worried.
Presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich last year derided Democrats as "the party of food stamps". And Republican leaders in the House of Representatives propose changing the program so that the funding is through a "block grant" to the states, rather than allowing it to grow automatically when needed due to an emergency, such as a natural disaster or economic crisis.
In some parts of the country, shoppers using food stamps have almost become the norm. In May 2011, a third of all people in Alabama were on food stamps -- though part of that was because of emergency assistance after communities were destroyed by a series of destructive tornadoes. Washington D.C., Mississippi, New Mexico, Oregon and Tennessee all had about a fifth of their population on food stamps that month.
"Food stamps have traditionally been insulated from politics," said Parke Wilde, professor of U.S. food policy at Tufts University. "But as you look over the current fiscally conservative proposals, the question is, has something fundamentally changed?"
A LOW WAGE SUPPORT PROGRAM
Over the past 20 years, the characteristics of the program's recipients have changed. In 1989, a higher percentage were on benefits than working, but as of 2009 a higher percentage had earned income.
"SNAP is increasingly work support," said Ed Bolen, an analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
And that's only likely to get worse: So far in the recovery, jobs growth has been concentrated in lower-wage occupations, with minimal growth in middle-income wages as many higher-paid blue collar jobs have disappeared.
And 6 percent of the 72.9 million Americans paid by the hour received wages at or below the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour in 2010. That's up from 4.9 percent in 2009, and 3 percent in 2002, according to government data.
Bolen said just based on income, minimum wage single parents are almost always eligible for food stamps.
"This becomes an implicit subsidy for low-wage jobs and in terms of incentives for higher wage job creation that really is not a good thing," said Arindrajit Dube, an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, whose research shows raising the minimum wage would spur economic activity.
Until a couple of weeks ago Tashawna Green, 21, from Queens Village, New York, worked 25 hours a week at an $8.08 hourly rate at retailer Target. She is on food stamps, and says a good number of her former colleagues are too.
"It's a good thing that the government helps, but if employers paid enough and gave enough hours, then we wouldn't need to be on food stamps," said Green, who has a six-year-old daughter.
Of course, with an unemployment rate over 9 percent, some argue that those with any job at all are lucky.
Millions of Americans whose unemployment benefits have expired have to exist only on food stamps and other government aid, such as Medicaid healthcare support. [nN1E7660K4]
And even with unemployment benefits, said Jessica King, 25, from Portland, Oregon, her family juggles bills to ensure the electricity stays on. They are also selling some belongings on Craigslist to raise funds.
King's husband Stephen, 30, an electronics assembly worker, lost his job two months ago when she was seven months pregnant with their second child. It was the third time he has been laid off since 2008.
She said she was reluctant, initially, to go on food stamps.
"I felt the way our national debt was going I didn't want to be part of the problem," said King, who used to work as a cook at a faith-based non-profit organization.
"But I didn't know what else to do and I got to a point where I swallowed my pride and decided to do what was best for my daughter."

Carbon tax no calamity for Queensland, says report

The federal carbon pricing scheme will have a “relatively small” impact on the Queensland economy over the next 10 years, but the state will be hit harder in the longer term.
New Queensland Treasury modelling suggests employment will grow at two per cent a year regardless of whether a carbon price is introduced, with 474,000 extra jobs expected to be created by 2020.
It says the carbon price will cost the state budget between $251 million and $360 million each year, totalling $1.2 billion between now and 2015-16.
State Labor Treasurer Andrew Fraser said this impact was mainly due to lost revenue from state-owned electricity generators, an issue the government was still pursuing with Prime Minister Julia Gillard.
Mr Fraser used the modelling to dismiss claims of looming “economic calamity” as a result of the carbon price, but the opposition today continued its attack on the “big new tax”.
State growth would be about 0.4 per cent lower than it otherwise would have been by 2019-20, and 3.5 per cent lower by 2049-50, according to the document. But growth of 3.5 per cent a year would continue.

Outlook gloomy on global warming: Deutsche

Deutsche Bank's head of carbon emissions research Mark Lewis can't see how the world can avoid dangerous global warming - judged as greater than two degrees Celsius - based on the targets agreed at climate change summits in Copenhagen and Cancun.
Mr Lewis said a target to restrict global warming to those two degrees is "probably unrealistic now, because of the politics; not because the technology isn't there, not because with the right policies it's just not possible - it's just that there isn't the political will".
Without the United States signing up, there's unlikely to be a global deal on emissions reduction negotiated at the next climate summit in Durban, South Africa. Without such a pact, there will be no successor to the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
"Frankly the UN process has become, not totally irrelevant, but it's not the forum where a meaningful global deal is going to be brokered that will get you on a two degrees centigrade trajectory," Paris-based Mr Lewis said on a recent visit to Australia.
"That is not the political framework through which this (trajectory) is going to be delivered. I can't tell you there is a ready-made alternative framework in place that will allow a global deal to be delivered because I don't believe that either."
Deutsche Bank's Australian environment, social and governance analyst, Tim Jordan, agrees government emissions reduction pledges for the post-Copenhagen period were ambitious. Still, "even if we assume that they fully deliver on their pledges there is still a several-gigatonne gap between what the scientists are telling us we need to be delivering by 2020, and what the pledges would take us to," Mr Jordan said.
And that gap assumes governments will deliver on their pledges. "It's not obvious we're going to see every country live up to even the low end of their pledged emissions reduction ranges," Mr Jordan said.
'Bottom up'
Progress on cutting emissions, though, will come as "bottom-up" deals in jurisdictions including Australia, California (which will have an emissions trading scheme from January 2013), South Korea, Japan (once it had recovered from this year's natural disasters), China and Brazil take effect, Deutsche's Mr Lewis said.
Rising oil, gas and coal prices would over time create a strong incentive for energy efficiency, Mr Lewis said, as well as investment in clean energy.
"You have a cost curve for fossil fuels rising ... you have a cost curve for clean energies that is going in the opposite direction because technology is leading to improvements, and also as these technologies mature the possibilities for large-scale deployment increase, so you've got an economies of scale argument as well.
"You put those two together, at some point - I can't tell you when it is, and it will vary by technology - you've got inflection points where clean technologies become viable on a stand-alone basis, even without a carbon price."

Saturday 20 August 2011

Experts Keep An Eye On The Turrialba Volcano

For over 100 years the Turrialba was dormant, but now is visited weekly by experts who are tracking its changes.

Recently, experts have been investigating new holes in the craters, where the temperature of gas emissions has been rising and forming a single plume of gas that is visible at the top.

The Turrialba volcano records an average of 100 micro quakes daily. In addition, the degassing is affecting production at nearby crop and dairy farms.

To follow the pulse of the temperatures the University of Costa Rica (UCR) has installed infrared cameras, this along with the seismic stations, it will allow experts to learn any drastic change at the volcano in minutes.

Cameras have also been installed at the Poás volcano.

Last July 22 the Ministry of Environment and Telecommunications (MINAET) decided to reopen the Turrialba Volcano National Park, that had been closed since January 2010 activity. 


Source: http://insidecostarica.com/dailynews/2011/august/19/costarica11081902.htm

Tropical Storm Harvey forms in the Caribbean

(CNN) -- A tropical storm formed in the Caribbean Friday and is expected to move across the coast of Belize Saturday afternoon or night.
Tropical Storm Harvey has maximum sustained winds of 40 mph, with higher gusts, according to the Miami-based National Hurricane Center.
The storm is forecast to strengthen somewhat before its center reaches Belize.
A tropical storm warning is in effect for the coast of Belize and for the Bay Islands of Honduras, which Harvey is predicted to pass near Friday night.
A tropical storm watch is in effect for the coasts of Honduras, Guatemala and the southeastern coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, from Punta Gruesa south to Chetumal.
A warning means that tropical storm conditions are expected within 36 hours while a watch means that storm conditions are possible within 48 hours.
As of 2 p.m. ET Friday, Tropical Storm Harvey was located about 155 miles east of Isla Roatan, Honduras, heading west at 10 mph.
The storm is predicted to dump between 3 and 5 inches of rain across Honduras, Guatemala and Belize, with up to 8 inches possible in some places.

Solar energy cost hits par with coal fuel

THE cost of solar power in parts of NSW has for the first time crept below that of coal-fired electricity - seen as a key tipping point for the expansion of renewable energy.
New data shows solar power is edging towards ''grid parity'', after which it becomes cheaper than fossil fuel-generated energy such as coal and gas, even taking into account the upfront cost of buying rooftop solar panels.
But it was one of the few bright spots for an industry suffering from a 93 per cent drop in rooftop panel installations since the boom late last year at the peak of the NSW bonus scheme.
Workers at Australia's only commercial solar cell maker, the Silex plant at Homebush in Sydney, were told yesterday that cell production would be outsourced to China.

Business seeks carbon tax escape clause

BIG business is demanding the Gillard government include economic ''safety valves'' so carbon tax legislation can be ''scaled down'' if its core assumptions of indefinite economic growth and steady progress in international climate negotiations turn out to be wrong.
Business Council of Australia chief executive Jennifer Westacott told the Herald the carbon tax bills had been ''drafted so all the environmental elements can't be stopped but the business protections can be eroded.''
''We think it is just commonsense, in this environment of economic volatility and no binding action by other countries, that the government should be able to review and adjust what it is doing in response to what happens,'' she said.

Sunday 14 August 2011

Banana Peels May Clean Water

Other than placing them in the road and hoping an enemy walks by and slips on them, there doesn't seem to be many uses for the banana peel. Unlike some other fruit (we’re talking to you, orange), we can’t zest the peel for added flavor in cooking, or eat the peel, like an apple. Once you've eaten the fruit inside, the peel just becomes a useless, black, slimy, smelly remnant of yummier things. Right?
Perhaps we’re not asking enough from our fruit by only requiring them to be tasty. That seems possible with the banana, particular since a Brazilian researcher, Gustavo Castro, how happens to be both an environmental chemist and a banana lover, has found that the peel of a banana may be able to clean polluted water.

Castro said he had often heard that the peel of the banana was the most healthy part of the fruit, so he decided to take a look at the chemical composition. What he found was nitrogen, sulfur and organic compounds such as carboxylic acids – the very acids that can bind with metals that commonly pollute waters by industrial facilities.
So he tried it, taking chopped up, dried banana peels to the Parana River in Brazil, which has both copper and lead pollution. And guess what – the peels worked just as good if not better than many water filtering systems being used, and they can be used up to 11 times before they’re no longer effective. Plus they’re cheap.
Another great scientific breakthrough that could lead to cheaper costs for water purification, and more respect for one of nature’s tastiest treats.

Source: http://www.tinygreenbubble.com/eco/environmental/item/2095-banana-peels-may-clean-water

Characterization of mercury bioremediation by transgenic bacteria expressing metallothionein and polyphosphate kinase

Background

The use of transgenic bacteria has been proposed as a suitable alternative for mercury remediation. Ideally, mercury would be sequestered by metal-scavenging agents inside transgenic bacteria for subsequent retrieval. So far, this approach has produced limited protection and accumulation. We report here the development of a transgenic system that effectively expresses metallothionein (mt-1) and polyphosphate kinase (ppk) genes in bacteria in order to provide high mercury resistance and accumulation.

Results

In this study, bacterial transformation with transcriptional and translational enhanced vectors designed for the expression of metallothionein and polyphosphate kinase provided high transgene transcript levels independent of the gene being expressed. Expression of polyphosphate kinase and metallothionein in transgenic bacteria provided high resistance to mercury, up to 80 microM and 120 microM, respectively. Here we show for the first time that metallothionein can be efficiently expressed in bacteria without being fused to a carrier protein to enhance mercury bioremediation. Cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry analyzes revealed that the mt-1 transgenic bacteria accumulated up to 100.2 +/-17.6 microM of mercury from media containing 120 microM Hg. The extent of mercury remediation was such that the contaminated media remediated by the mt-1 transgenic bacteria supported the growth of untransformed bacteria. Cell aggregation, precipitation and color changes were visually observed in mt-1 and ppk transgenic bacteria when these cells were grown in high mercury concentrations.

Conclusion

The transgenic bacterial system described in this study presents a viable technology for mercury bioremediation from liquid matrices because it provides high mercury resistance and accumulation while inhibiting elemental mercury volatilization. This is the first report that shows that metallothionein expression provides mercury resistance and accumulation in recombinant bacteria. The high accumulation of mercury in the transgenic cells could present the possibility of retrieving the accumulated mercury for further industrial applications.

Source: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/11/82/abstract

Coalition on attack over carbon tax modelling

THE Coalition is questioning the integrity of global carbon markets, the credibility of Treasury modelling and the introduction of a new tax in times of global economic uncertainty as the anti-carbon tax campaign ramps up ahead of the parliamentary debate in September.
As Labor, the Greens and the cross-bench independents prepare to pass the unpopular tax, the Coalition and business groups are intensifying a campaign to discredit modelling that estimates its impact on household prices to be modest and the international carbon markets with which the Australian scheme would link.
The Liberal Senator Mathias Cormann used the inquiry to accuse the Treasury of ''cherry-picking'' evidence from a critical World Bank report in order to turn a ''bleak'' picture of ''collapsing'' global carbon markets into a rosy one.
A Treasury official, Meghan Quinn, defended the use of the World Bank report in the modelling document, saying there had been ''no cherry picking or lack of acknowledgement of the difficulties around the international regime'' and that an increase of $11 billion between 2005 and 2009, to $144 billion, followed by a reduction to $142 billion in 2010 ''cannot be characterised as total collapse''.

Qld disasters claim turtles and dugongs

Saturday, August 13, 2011 » 10:38am
 
Authorities are blaming a spike in turtle deaths on Queensland's summer of natural disasters. 
Authorities are blaming a spike in turtle deaths on Queensland's summer of natural disasters.
turtle deaths on Queensland's summer of natural disasters.
Figures released on Friday show 649 turtle deaths were reported in the first seven months of 2011.
The toll has jumped by more than 200 compared with the same period last year when 436 turtles died.
It comes after figures showed 96 dugongs washed up dead on the state's coastline in the first seven months of this year, compared with 79 for the whole of 2010.
A breakdown of the figures show 90 turtles died in the Gladstone area in central Queensland, home to a major port and a growing number of ships and dredging projects for the gas export industry.
There were 84 deaths in Townsville, 57 in Moreton Bay, 14 in Hervey Bay and the remainder spread across the state.
Queensland Environment Minister Vicky Darling said the majority of deaths were from malnutrition, sickness and diseases.
Like dugongs, turtles were struggling to find food because seagrass beds, their major food source, had been impacted by turbidity and low salinity following flooding in the coastal catchments, Ms Darling said on Friday.
'These are tragic and confronting numbers and they can be directly attributed to the floods and cyclones,' she said.
'These animals are struggling to find a food source and literally starving to death.'
Ms Darling said the turtles were weak and as a result spent more time on the water surface where they're more vulnerable to boat strikes.
The situation in Gladstone was the most concerning, she said.
Former environment minister Kate Jones established a panel of marine scientists to examine the causes of deaths in Gladstone.
Ms Darling said the panel's work wasn't finalised yet but a number of initial recommendations were underway such as improved reporting and turtle health checks.

Source: http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Environment/2011/08/13/Qld_disasters_claim_turtles_and_dugongs_649759.html

Carbon tax to hit just 400 polluters

First it was thought the carbon tax would apply to 1000 of Australia's biggest polluters, then it was 500, and now the climate change department says it's "more like 400".
The federal government wants to introduce a carbon tax on facilities that emit more than 25,000 tonnes of carbon pollution each year from mid-2012.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard originally said the price would be paid by the top 1000 polluters in the country.
But when the $23-a-tonne carbon price was announced in July, that figure was cut in half.
"Around 500 of the biggest polluters in Australia will be required to pay for their pollution under the carbon pricing mechanism," the government's policy documents released on July 10 state.
Now the figure has been revised downwards again.
"Under the previous package [Kevin Rudd's carbon pollution reduction scheme] the number that we thought was going to be in the system was more in the order of 700," Climate Change Department secretary Blair Comley said on Wednesday.
"[Now] the number of emitters that we think will be covered is more in the order of more like 400."
Mr Comley was giving evidence in Canberra to a parliamentary inquiry into the proposed carbon tax.
The change of scope was due to the differing treatment of liquid fuels and synthetic gases under Ms Gillard's carbon price mechanism, he said.
But the 400 figure is somewhat rubbery.

Saturday 13 August 2011

Arctic Ice Thinning 4 Times Faster Than Predicted

According to new research from MIT, the most recent global climate report fails to capture trends in Arctic sea-ice thinning and drift, and in some cases substantially underestimates these trends….
After comparing IPCC models with actual data, [lead author Pierre] Rampal and his collaborators concluded that the forecasts were significantly off: Arctic sea ice is thinning, on average, four times faster than the models say, and it’s drifting twice as quickly.


Read More: http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/08/11/294403/arctic-ice-thinning-4-times-faster-than-predicted-by-models-semi-stunning-m-i-t-study-finds/#more-294403

Gas Fracking Poses Serious Environmental Risks, Panel Finds

Natural-gas companies risk causing serious environmental damage from hydraulic fracturing unless they commit to the best engineering practices, a task force named by Energy Secretary Steven Chu concluded.
Regulations to protect public health will work best when drillers embrace techniques that avoid “undesirable consequences,” according to a draft report today by a subcommittee of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board. The increased use of fracturing, or fracking, which forces water and chemicals into rock, raises the potential for a “serious problem,” the panel found.
The report offered recommendations for companies involved in fracking, such as Chesapeake Energy Inc. and Southwestern Energy Co. (SWN), to follow, and guidelines for state regulators that oversee drilling.
“While many states and several federal agencies regulate aspects of these operations, the efficacy of the regulations is far from clear,” according to the report. “Effective action requires both strong regulation and a shale-gas industry in which all participating companies are committed to continuous improvement.”

Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-11/gas-fracking-poses-serious-environmental-risks-u-s-panel-finds.html

Uncontacted Amazon tribes could be wiped out by drug traffickers and oil companies

Brazilian officials fear for the survival of an isolated Amazon group after a remote guard post on the Peru-Brazil border was overrun by heavily armed suspected drug traffickers who crossed the border from Peru. The guard post was protecting the headwaters of the Envira river where stunning aerial photographs of an isolated tribe has made worldwide headlines in 2008.
The Peruvian government has been repeatedly criticized for failing to protect isolated indigenous peoples. As recently as June of this year the Peruvian Ombudsman office wrote a scathing letter to Peru's Ministry of Culture criticizing them for allowing isolated peoples reserves to become overrun by loggers and oil drilling.
Carlos Travassos, the head of the Brazilian government's isolated Indians department (FUNAI), said, "We think the Peruvians made the Indians flee. Now we have good proof. We are more worried than ever. This situation could be one of the biggest blows we have ever seen in the protection of uncontacted Indians in recent decades. It's a catastrophe."
In Peru, less than 150 miles to the south, oil company Pluspetrol in consortium with Spanish Repsol and US company Hunt Oil is pushing ahead with expansion of oil drilling and exploration inside an isolated peoples reserve in Block 88 in an area known to be inhabited by indigenous people with little or no contact with the outside world and extreme vulnerability to introduced diseases. This expansion has been supported and facilitated by the Peruvian government agency responsible for protecting isolated peoples, INDEPA.
In the north of Peru, Peru's Energy Ministry recently gave the green light to Anglo-French company Perenco to build a pipeline to Oil Block 67 in a proposed isolated peoples reserve and perhaps the most biodiverse area in South America. Despite ample evidence and reports documenting the presence of isolated peoples, the Peruvian government has continued to push ahead with oil development in Block 67 and surrounding Block 39, operated by Repsol-YPF, in what amounts to a cover-up of the evidence of isolated peoples.
The Peruvian government has repeatedly failed to protect the lives rights of some of the world's most vulnerable people. In the 1980s over half the Nahua people were wiped out by introduced diseases following contact with loggers after Shell explored the area for oil. Today territories and reserves for isolated peoples are more under threat than ever before as oil exploration expands unchecked into some of the most remote areas of the Amazon and the Peruvian government continues to fail to protect isolated peoples' territories from loggers and drug traffickers.

Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-11/gas-fracking-poses-serious-environmental-risks-u-s-panel-finds.html

Friday 12 August 2011

How biofuels are destroying Indigenous communities in Malaysia


Logging and then palm oil plantations have cost the Batek and the Penan much of their rainforest homelands. 

In the most common progression, logging companies obtain concessions from state governments with little or no resistance from indigenous peoples who have limited land rights and rarely read or write Malay, Malaysia’s official language.
In the past, many communities were unaware that a logging concession had been filed until heavy equipment turned up and began felling the forest on their ancestral land.
Loggers claim they log sustainably. This is rarely the case. Opening up logging roads and dragging out felled trees devastates the thin tropical topsoil.
After the second or even third pass to harvest all valuable tree species, the forest is ravaged. The soil erodes in tropical downpours; animals leave or starve to death; the silted rivers become devoid of fish.
After the loggers are gone, the oil palm plantations move in.

Source: http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=5181#more-5181

Excessive radioactive cesium found in Fukushima fish: Greenpeace

TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Fish caught at a port about 55 kilometers from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant contained radioactive cesium at levels exceeding an allowable limit, the environmental group Greenpeace said Tuesday.
The samples taken at Onahama port in Iwaki, Fukushima Prefecture, in late July, included a species of rockfish that measured 1,053 becquerels per kilogram. The reading, the highest among the samples, is well in excess of the government-set limit of 500 becquerels per kilogram, according to a study conducted by the environmental group.
The other samples, which were all rock trout, measured between 625 and 749 becquerels per kilogram, again exceeding the provisional limit.
The second such study of marine products was conducted over three days from July 22 in Iwaki and the town of Shinchi with cooperation of fishermen and those related to the fisheries industry in Fukushima. A total of 21 samples taken in the study were analyzed at a research institute in France, according to the group.
"There is no allowable limit for internal exposure that can conclusively be said not to pose any problems," Greenpeace said in a petition submitted to Prime Minister Naoto Kan on Tuesday, noting the need to keep consumption of the food containing elevated levels of radioactive materials to a minimum.
The petition also calls for tougher marine-product monitoring and for requiring businesses to display the level of radioactive materials contained in food products on the label.

Solar Charging Option for Ford Focus Electric

If you’re looking at electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles with the environment being as big a factor in the choice as saving at the pump, then Ford’s recent announcement that the Electric Focus will come with a solar charging option will be of definite interest to you.
The home solar charging kit comes courtesy Ford’s partnership with SunPower which will supply the 2.5 kilowatt solar panel system that gets mounted on your rooftop. With weather permitting the system will generate 3,000 kWh of electricity per year which amounts to enough juice to power your Focus across 12,000 miles.
Ford is referring to the option as “Drive Green for Life” as it obviously offsets the potentially environmentally unfriendly methods of power generation that your local power plant may rely on. If your power is coming from coal, as many households in the U.S. do, then this makes you one hell of green driver.
Cost of the Focus solar power package will run you $10,000. So guilt free driving still costs a little more than many would like. Tell us what you think though, is this a viable option for electric cars of the future or an overpriced, dead-end solution?

Source: http://www.ecoautoninja.com/eco-electric-vehicles/solar-charging-option-for-ford-focus-electric-39237/

Sunday 7 August 2011

Tighter Oil Supply in 2012?

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has, in a recent report, said that oil supplies would become "critically tight" in 2012. Analysts of the bank predict that oil prices could go even higher as spare production capacity and inventories are "effectively exhausted." So, why not increase production, from say, Saudi Arabia? Well, Goldman has also shared apprehension on the ability of Saudi Arabia to raise oil production in the face of eventual scarcity as it believes that Saudi Arabia won't be able to pump as much extra oil as many people believe. On a scary note, the scarcity could occur as early as later this year.

First to the case of Saudi Arabia:

It's no secret that Saudi Arabia, in a desperate attempt to hold on to power, is trying hard to win back its people. After all, the wave of massive protest for democracy did shake the Middle East. So what does it do? Take this: King Abdullah's has announced generous subsidies to construct 500,000 houses for the poor, a friendly mortgage law for the common man to buy property, finances for infrastructure, religious organisations, and for improving the education and health system, a pay rise for workers in the public sector, unemployment benefits, and more education allowance for students. To be sure, it also helps that the country has massive reserves for all the spending, thanks to oil. In two packages, the first announced in February for $36 billion, and the second in March for $94 billion, the ruler is fighting to win back his people. Together, the $130 billion is equal to 30 percent of the kingdom's GDP, or revenues from oil export for eight months.
All this, the IMF predicted, would help Saudi Arabia's GDP growth by 7.5% (Since revised to 6.5 per cent ). With 24.9 percent of the 1,000 billion barrels proven oil reserves of OPEC, the country has the largest oil reserves in the world and is also one of the largest producers of oil, next only to Russia. IEA holds that Saudi Arabia is capable of producing up to 12 million barrels of oil a day, compared to nine million barrels a day in May. Early this year with tensions ranging in Libya, the IEA's executive director, Nobuo Tanaka had said that Saudi Arabia could easily offset any shortfall in production from Libya.
With such huge reserves, in the meeting on June 8, Saudi Arabia, along with Kuwait, and the UAE pressed for increase in production quotas. But, countries like Libya, Algeria, Venezuela, Ecuador, Iraq, Iran, were against the move. Consequently, no decision was reached and the production quotas remained unchanged. Of course, the last thing the Saudi government needs at this point is high inflation due to import of expensive food grain, offset by high transportation charges due to high oil prices. Some indicators to gauge the extent of price fluctuation in recent times: The oil price hit $101.08 (Brent crude) a barrel in February, the highest since October 2008 (In June 2008, they were jogging around $147 a barrel). In June, 2011 they fell to $90 a barrel amid fears of supply disruption due to the closure of Suez canal and Egypt unrest.
Hence, Saudi Arabia has, quite unilaterally, pledged to increase production, notwithstanding the OPEC decision. According to a Platts survey, oil production from OPEC shot up by 530,000 barrels per day in June, at a total of 29.57 million barrels per day, compared to the 29.04 million b/d in May. And guess what? Saudi Arabia's production was up by 450,000 barrels per day to reach a total of 9.5 million b/d. Kuwait, UAE too have increased production, according to the survey. And don't forget most of this increase is just enough to meet the growing demand at home.
Saudi Arabia, essentially, is putting more oil on the market to pay for generous welfare programs, basically "buying out" its population from joining in on the unrest that spread through other oil producing nations. This is unsustainable and will accelerate well depletion. At this point, no one knows the actual reserves of the country, which is dangerous in itself.

IEA's move

The twenty eight member IEA, announced its decision to would release oil, about 60 million barrel, from the strategic reserves this August. This, it said, was to compensate for the loss due to the volatile situation in Libya. It is only the third time since established in 1974 that the IEA has taken such a step. One thing to be noted is that Libya, with less than two percent of the global oil output, isn't a huge player in the oil industry. In real terms, thus, the shortfall isn't going to make any significant changes to the oil supply. From a short term perspective, this move would help lower the price of oil. (The news did ease the oil price, since regained. ) However, in the long term, the reserves have to be replaced, and if the demand rises, this short term measure will push up oil prices.

Demand

As a more affluent population in BRICs consumes more goods, fuel usage for transportation and farming also increases. According to a UN report earlier this year, the world population would reach seven billion later this year and increase to 14 billion by 2100, if left unchecked. This doesn't necessarily abide by the math rule of 'the more people, the more pressure on the resources of the planet' theory, as people from the wealthy nations consume more, and waste more. However, what happens when the poor move higher on the economic scale. They have every right to the resources too, don't they? Still, continued growth in BRIC countries means motorized vehicle usage will increase. IMF has, in its update of the WEO World Economic Outlook, predicts a growth rate of 7.8 percent for India, and 9.2 percent for China in 2012 next year. This will have a lever effect: less oil production capacity while the demand skyrockets.
According to Bureau of Economic analysis the US economy has declined by 1.8 percent in the first quarter. The latest U.S. job report showed a weak economic recovery with just 18,000 jobs created in June, and in the revised World economic outlook, IMF has since adjusted the growth for advanced economies to 2.5 percent from 2.6 percent. Indeed, the earthquake in Japan, the resultant disruption in the supply chain, and uncertainty with the varying pace of the economic recovery in the US economy's progress, are some of the reasons for the low demand for crude oil for the first half of 2011.
However, when US returns to faster growth, the Japanese economy bounces back, and Europe recovers from the debt crisis and thus a global recovery, what do we have in our hands, a supply deficit for oil.
In fact, Goldman predicts that the world economy would accelerate in the second half of the year itself, increasing demand. "Prices and returns will rise further later this year and into 2012," a report from the bank said, predicting that Brent crude would average at $120 in six months and $130 in 2012. An EIA report estimates that the oil demand will surpass production by 1.16 million barrels per day this year. The reports also suggests that the oil demand around the world to rise by 1.6 million bbl/d in 2012, a gap of 0.5 million barrels per day (only with increased production). The IMF, for its part, in the updated World Economic Outlook (WEO) for 2011, puts the assumed price for oil based on futures market at $105.25 in 2012. Analyst Hussein Allidina, from Morgan Stanley, said "We remain bullish on oil, particularly in the second half, and expect inventory draws will prompt OPEC to increase production, at the expense of spare capacity".
Of course, by 2012, we'll know which of these predictions come true, though wishful thinking hopes that, somehow, we've got it all wrong. Banks are bullish, you know why. But can we sit back, wait and watch as oil prices spiral, because spare capacity was exhausted?
So, really, did the Mayans predict the end of the world in 2012 or did they run out of space on their calendar? More like what Lady Macbeth said, "Almost at odds with morning, which is which." Superstitions and old wives tales aside, if we look at the oil supply/demand numbers, with close to 7 billion people, we are approaching the planet's carrying capacity. With the oil market set to go through a lot of stress in the coming year, 2012 will surely mark a turning point to remember.

Source: http://oil-price.net/en/articles/tighter-oil-supply-in-2012.php

Friday 5 August 2011

Smart meter displays change consumer behaviour in Texas

Survey results from a 500 participant smart meter In-Home Display pilot programme in Texas show that 71% of customers reported that they have changed their electricity consumption behaviour as a result of having access to their energy use data.
The survey was carried out on the back of the implementation of smart meters and intelligent grid technology partly funded with a $200m Smart Grid Investment Grant from the US Department of Energy.
The survey responses showed that:
  • 83% of respondents reported turning off lights at night or when not in the room,
  • 51%  adjusted the temperature on their thermostat,
  • 93% reported they are satisfied with their in-home display, and 97% reported they will continue using it.
To date, CenterPoint Energy has installed nearly 1.5 million smart meters in its 2.2 million meter system, with complete deployment due next year. Consumers who have already received their smart meter can get detailed information on their electric usage by visiting SmartMeterTexas.com. In the future they will have the option of purchasing an in-home display, providing them with up-to-the-minute usage information. 

There’s a lot of scepticism about the use of smart meters, particularly if all they provide is information about energy use, as in this case. It’s interesting to see how and when energy is used and the impact minor changes in use can have, but you can’t help wondering whether the novelty will wear off. This survey confirms that this type of real-time data can have an impact, but they need to carry out a follow-up survey in a year or two to see if people are still taking any notice.
Smart meters may have some impact on their own, but my view is that they will only really come into their own when they’re combined with smart grids that offer differential pricing, so you can actively manage energy use to save money. Without that, the best bet to reduce usage is to provide online analysis that shows the customer’s electricity use compared with figures for neighbours. Wanting to do better than others (and save more money than they do) is a powerful incentive.

Source: http://www.thegreenitreview.com/2011/08/smart-meter-displays-change-consumer.html

Mysterious orange goo washes up in Alaska village

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Authorities say a mysterious orange-colored substance has washed up on the shores of a remote village in northwest Alaska.

Tests have been conducted on the substance on the surface of the water in Kivalina. City Administrator Janet Mitchell told The Associated Press that the substance has also shown up in some residents' rain buckets.

Coast Guard Petty Officer David Mosely tells KTUU that it's not a petroleum substance and it's not man-made. Mitchell says the village is requesting that an algae expert from the University of Alaska Fairbanks investigate.

Pictures taken by resident Mida Swan show an orange sheen across the harbor and on beaches in the village about 625 miles northwest of Anchorage.

Swan says she didn't smell anything odd when she dipped her hand into the substance.

Source: http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2011/08/04/news/doc4e3b3dda9d10d174841545.txt

Keep Australia Beautiful Week 2011

Keep Australia Beautiful Week (KAB Week) is held at the end of August each year, and was developed by Keep Australia Beautiful to remind people about the simple things they can do in their daily lives to reduce the impact on the environment and encourage action.

In 2011, KAB Week will be held from Monday 22nd August to Sunday 28th August.

It is estimated that about 80 percent of marine debris is from land based sources. Littered items such as cigarette butts and food and beverage containers, reach the ocean and rivers through run-off from storm water drains.

To highlight this avoidable environmental problem, this year's campaign will focus on the effects litter has on our oceans and waterways, and the direct impact it has on the health and safety of marine wildlife.

Whilst the campaign is still being developed, you may like to consider ways that you can help raise awareness of the issue of marine litter and help promote it at your school, university, in your local area, or in the media. Here's just one idea...

Create your own marine animal 'litter art' to help spread the message

The 'Plastic Bag Monster' below is a creation by Slovenian artist Miha Artnak, who put it on display outside the European Commission headquarters in May this year. Artnak collected 40,000 used plastic bags and 7,500 used plastic cups to create the 'Plastic Bag Monster' artwork, which symbolises the spread of consumerism and waste.
RUETERS/Francois Lenoir 



Read More: http://www.kab.org.au/programs/keep-australia-beautiful-week/

U.S,,,New Energy Star programme

The US Environmental Protection Agency (imageEPA) has announced a new Energy Star programme to identify the most efficient products with the Energy Star label. The programme will start this year, on a pilot basis, with clothes washers, heating and cooling equipment, televisions, and fridge-freezers.
According to the EPA “Product categories were selected and recognition criteria were established to ensure that products that receive this recognition demonstrate efficiency performance that is truly exceptional, inspirational, or leading edge — consistent with the interests of environmentally-motivated consumers and early adopters”.

It’s an interesting development that, hopefully, will eventually include green ICT products. The problem with the Energy Star labelling system is that there’s currently no incentive for manufacturers to do more than reach a minimum requirement. The EPA can up the criteria over time, but there’s no challenge to do better. The ‘Most Efficient’ label will help, by giving the best performers more recognition.
The alternative would be to have various levels of achievement, as is the case with the EPEAT Gold, Silver and Bronze certification for green IT equipment – I guess the ‘Most Efficient’ label is a step in this direction. Better still would be to simply have a ranking of comparable products, showing the most energy efficient. I wouldn’t like to be the person responsible for that, though.

 Source: http://www.thegreenitreview.com/

Department faces Coalition axe

THE Coalition could axe the Department of Climate Change and get the Environment Department to oversee its ''direct action'' climate policy as part of an attempt to save money by cutting 12,000 public servants, shadow ministers have suggested.
The opposition's finance spokesman, Andrew Robb, pictured, backed the idea first raised by the shadow treasurer, Joe Hockey, on the ABC program Lateline on Wednesday night, to get rid of the Climate Change Department, which employs more than 1000 people.
''We haven't made any final decisions, but certainly the expenditure that's going into literally hundreds and hundreds of bureaucrats in that area, if we remove the carbon tax we will remove the need for … the hundreds of millions of dollars of new expenditure that is being incurred,'' he said. ''And there is every reason why that department should be folded back in as part of the Department of Environment.''

Experts dismiss Treasury concerns over job cuts

ECONOMISTS have rejected NSW Treasury estimates that the carbon tax would slash 31,000 jobs in the state.
Professor John Quiggin, from the School of Economics at the University of Queensland, said the job figures were ''meaningless'' because they failed to take into account the larger number of jobs likely to be created in renewable energy industries.
Bill Mitchell, a professor of economics from the University of Newcastle, said the carbon tax would actually increase jobs.
''If you were to close coal-fired power generation and were to replace it with renewable power generation, you get a net increase in employment …'' he said.
''Coal-fired power stations don't employ that many people and rewewables offer a wider range of job opportunities, ranging from design and research, advertising, manufacturing, construction and implementation, sales and marketing, and installations.''

Tuesday 2 August 2011

How will the carbon price affect you?

The introduction of a carbon price will cost households an extra $9.90 per week on average, while average assistance will be $10.10 per week, according to the Federal Government's modelling.
The Government says nine out of 10 households will receive assistance.
Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says 10 per cent of households will get nothing and 60 per cent will be worse off or line-ball.
All estimates below are based on modelling released by the Federal Government, which the Opposition has questioned.

Calculator

The Government has released a calculator so Australians can estimate how the carbon price will affect their household.

Tables

The tables linked below outline the Government's modelling on how the carbon price will affect various Australian households. Dig into the details to see how the Government says you will be affected.

Individuals

Single parents

Single-income couple

Dual-income (50:50) couple

Dual-income (70:30) couple

Seniors

Note: Links above point to single-page excerpts from the document Supporting Australian households, released as part of the Government's carbon pricing details.

Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-07-10/how-will-the-carbon-price-affect-you/2789092